LRB vs FPS: Which Seismic Isolator is Better? | Seismic Isolation
Blog / LRB vs FPS
2026-03-13 6 min read Comparison

LRB vs FPS: Which Seismic Isolator is Better?

LRB vs FPS: Which Seismic Isolator is Better?
SI
Seismic Isolation Team
Earthquake Engineering Experts

When choosing seismic isolation for your building, you'll face a fundamental decision: Lead Rubber Bearing (LRB) or Friction Pendulum System (FPS)? Both are proven technologies with decades of successful applications, but they work on fundamentally different principles and offer distinct advantages.

How LRB Works

Lead Rubber Bearings consist of alternating layers of rubber and steel plates with a central lead core. The rubber provides flexibility, the steel plates ensure vertical load capacity, and the lead core provides energy dissipation (damping). During an earthquake, the rubber deforms laterally, and the lead core yields, absorbing seismic energy as heat.

How FPS Works

Friction Pendulum Systems use a curved sliding surface with an articulated slider. During an earthquake, the building slides along the concave surface, with gravity providing the restoring force. The friction between the slider and surface dissipates energy. The isolation period depends only on the radius of curvature, not the building weight.

Head-to-Head Comparison

FeatureLRBFPS
Self-CenteringExcellent (elastic rubber)Good (pendulum, friction resistance)
Damping Ratio15-30%10-20%
Vertical StiffnessHighVery High
Cost per Unit$8,000-25,000$12,000-35,000
Low-Intensity PerformanceActive at all levelsLimited (friction threshold)
Lifespan50+ years100+ years (theoretical)

When to Choose LRB

LRB is typically preferred for residential and commercial buildings where consistent performance at all earthquake levels is critical. It activates immediately at any ground motion level, provides excellent self-centering, and has the most extensive track record worldwide.

When to Choose FPS

FPS excels in heavy structures like bridges and industrial facilities. Its weight-independent period makes it ideal when consistent isolation performance is needed regardless of varying loads. However, its friction threshold means it may not activate during small earthquakes.

Not sure which is right for your building? Run our free analysis to get a personalized recommendation based on your building's specific parameters.

🌐 Read this article in Turkish: LRB vs FPS İzolator | Also available in Turkish on sismikizolasyon.com

What is Your Building's Earthquake Risk?

Get a location-specific risk analysis in 5 minutes. Detailed report based on AFAD data.

Free Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better: LRB or FPS isolator?

Neither is universally better; choice depends on project requirements. LRB offers higher damping and proven 50+ year track record, ideal for critical buildings. FPS provides weight-independent period, simpler installation, and lower maintenance. Cost and building specifications determine the optimal selection for each project.

What is the main advantage of FPS over LRB?

FPS primary advantage is weight-independent isolation period. Unlike LRB where isolation period depends on bearing stiffness and building weight, FPS period derives from the friction surface radius, enabling consistent performance across varying load conditions and simplifying design for complex structures.

Which isolator type is more cost-effective?

FPS is generally more cost-effective for light to medium-weight buildings due to lower bearing costs and simpler installation. LRB becomes cost-competitive for heavy buildings where the weight-dependent period advantage favors LRB design. Total system cost includes engineering, installation, and long-term maintenance expenses.

Do LRB isolators require more maintenance than FPS?

Yes, LRB isolators require more frequent maintenance than FPS. Lead core degradation and elastomer aging require periodic inspection every 5-10 years. FPS bearings have minimal wear on friction surfaces and need inspections every 10-15 years, reducing operational costs and downtime for seismic maintenance.

Share:

Free Earthquake Risk Analysis

Find out your building's seismic isolation needs in 2 minutes. Free analysis with real seismic data.

Start Free Analysis →